Effective Votes

The number of voters who actually voted for candidates that end up as MPs on the Government benches can be amazingly small.

The following chart shows, for each of the federal elections since Confederation, the percentage of voters who voted for a winning MP of the party that formed government1. For example, in the most recent (2019) election, the Liberals earned 6,018,728 votes (33.1% of all votes) and formed a minority Government. However, only 3,793,819 of the votes cast for a Liberal candidate were for a candidate who won. That’s only 20.9% of all the votes cast.

The colour of the bar is reflective of the ideology of the party forming government: liberal is red and conservative is blue.

Loading chart...

The first chart, above, shows the effective votes for the party winning the most seats. The following is just like it except that it shows, in a lighter shade, the ineffective votes for that same party. Ineffective votes are votes cast for a candidate from that party where the candidate does not win.

Loading chart...

The following chart is the same as the first chart except that it adds the effective votes for the MPs belonging to the Opposition. Orange colours represent labour-oriented parties (NDP); lavender colours represent populist parties (Reform); light-blue for Quebec-based parties (the Bloc).

Loading chart...

The following chart shows, in the top stacked bar, the votes for all other winning MPs as a percentage of the total vote.

Loading chart...

Finally, the following chart adds the ineffective votes for the various parties. That is, those votes that did not help elect an MP.

Each bar has six regions. From top to bottom:

  • The percentage of the total votes that were cast for parties other than government and opposition where that candidate lost.
  • The percentage of the total votes cast for candidates of the party that formed the opposition but the candidate lost.
  • The percentage of the total votes cast for candidates of the party that formed the government but the candidate lost.
  • The percentage of the total votes cast for parties other than government and opposition where that candidate won.
  • The percentage of the total votes cast for candidates of the party that formed the opposition and the candidate won.
  • The percentage of the total votes cast for candidates of the party that formed the government and the candidate won.

Loading chart...

Statistics

Loading stats...


  1. “…the party that formed government” is a difficult concept in the early years of Confederation, before parties were firmly established. For example, in the first twelve elections (1867-1911) candidates ran for the “Conservative” party as well as the “Liberal-Conservative” party. Both parties were led by the same person, first by John A. Macdonald and then by Charles Tupper and Robert Borden. They naturally formed government together.

    We have made only limited attempts to account for this kind of situation. We have an “ideology code” assigned to each of the 140 parties in the database (see the notes under Raw Data/Party Summary) and run this same analysis counting votes by ideology code rather than strictly by party. Counting by ideology code groups the Conservatives and Liberal-Conservatives together, resulting in noticeably higher effective vote scores through the 1896 election. Starting with 1900, there are only six elections where the two approaches differ by more than 1%; namely (1911 - 1.5%, 1935 - 1.3%, 1940 - 3.2%, 1945 - 1.9%, 1953 - 1.2%, 1988 - 1.1%).

    Regardless of the approach, however, the main point remains: only a relatively few voters have voted for the MPs that form government. ↩︎